To sum up of the Court of Appeal in Kraków of November. Act there are no ground to claim that a renown trademark must be more widely known than a well-known trademark. Qualitativ, not quantitativ, criteria are decisive here. A reputable mark does not have to be widely known. Just as a well-known mark does not have to be reputable mark. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of April. A well-known trademark should be a recognize mark that has the following features. It must be known in most of the territory of Poland.
I will tell you how to outwit
It must be associate with a specific product by potential domestic recipient. It must be widely known among potential buyer. And therefore more than half people of this philippines photo editor group. However, potential recipients of good are not require to imagine that products with this mark are of particularly high quality. Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw of July. The doctrine indicate that “The protection of commonly known marks in the Industrial Property Law. Act is limite only to the risk of confusion as to the origin of the goods. The protection of commonly known mark creat by the provisions of the comment.
If you join the webinar
Act therefore concerns protection against the risk of mistakes and the risk of parasitism this is how. Tylec in Law industrial property. Comment, Warsaw art. IMPORTANT – common B2B Lead knowledg of the mark should be assesse in relation to the territory of the country Republic of Poland . Therefore, the owner of a trademark commonly known in the territory of the Republic of. Poland may request, subject to the provisions of Art. section point of the Industrial Property Law, to stop using an identical or. Similar mark in relation to identical or similar goods when such use may mislea.
